Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 02:55
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Relativistic jet detected in active galaxy Markarian 110 - Phys.org
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
How do flat Earthers explain the existence of other spherical planets?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Did Leonardo da Vinci paint two Mona Lisas? Where are they?
Thank you.
Russia can stop this any time.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Jonathan Joss, ‘King of the Hill’ and ‘Parks & Recreation’ actor, dead at 59 after shooting - CNN
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
How do I rat my boss out for serial cheating on his wife?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What’s next?
RPI researchers delighted when underwater volcano opened up beneath them - Times Union